Wednesday, July 28, 2010

MoreMarin Buzz Home: Tam High reunion invitation brouhaha

« SubUrban Legend - The day of the locust | Main | Video of the Day - Doga »

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Tam High reunion invitation brouhaha

An invitation to a local high school reunion has caused the fur to fly in Marin.

(Click to enlarge)

The invite for a class reunion for Tamalpais High School class of 1980, contains images that are offensive-- or at the very least-- insensitive. The invitation in question has a graphic of the now-banned former school name and mascot, the Tamalpais High Indians. In addition, an old image of a flirty Indian maid is also pictured. The mascot was changed to the Red Tailed Hawks in 1990.

The Pacific Sun's Nikki Silverstein mentioned the invite in her Hero and Zero column chastising the senders of the invitation for their insensitivity to Native Americans.

But it didn't end there.

What followed were a torrent of commenters on the Pacific Sun website slamming Silverstein for being too PC in her condemnation. A sample of some of the comments--

"Wow! When did Ms. Silverstein become the annointed moral barometer for Marin?"
  • "We were the TAMALPAIS INDIANS you and your PC NAZIS, yes nazis, can't change that and if you weren't a TAM INDIAN, why do you care"
  • "Dear Ms. Silverstein, what is wrong with the country quite frankly is...YOU! You and all the crones that harbor this politically correct agenda that is primarily designed to control people."

    Several commenters defend Ms. Silverstein, but they seem to be far fewer. We agree with the detractors in that it's one thing to use the images in a historical context; it's quite another to use them for marketing purposes. But what is really upsetting, are the vitriolic comments aimed at Silverstein.

    The story is beginning to make its way into the blogosphere. The reunion takes place at the end of August which means there is enough time for it to really heat up.

    Posted by Pam Gould at 10:55 AM in Mill Valley, What's With That?! | Permalink

    Comments

    Tonyboysf

    GO Indians! Schools - probably their coaches picked original team names I guess, and I doubt any were ever chosen to degrade
    or defame the people who's images were used.
    To the contrary, warriors, and indians and
    fierce animals were chosen to instill a spire of respect, dignity, and even admiration for the culture of ancients and native peoples. The fact that a few indians
    or others are personally offended by teams
    using their names is really unfortunate. I think they would be happier with a more positive attitude! Posted by a old Woodrow
    Wilson HS, Warrior(Greek style)70'


    Posted by: Tonyboysf | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 12:31 PM

    Tam Indian

    Go Indians! Class of '85.

    Thinking I'll attend this reunion to honor our mascott.

    Posted by: Tam Indian | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM

    icarus13

    Yeah, enough of this crap. Let's get down to a real politics of change. Give money to a land trust, volunteer to help others, work on a campaign to balance city and county budgets, serve your darn jury duty. This endless cultural politics is tiresome.

    Posted by: icarus13 | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 12:42 PM

    An Indian From The Class of 1980

    Additionally: Go (Fremont High School, S'vale) Indians!

    Screw PCism!

    Fremont Firebirds ... sheesh! What a joke.

    Posted by: An Indian From The Class of 1980 | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM

    m

    LOLZ - Are they gonna open up a Casino Night and sell discount cigs? Get Lives people! Where's the outrage over Obambi and Boosh letting the Mexi's over the border like it ain't even there?

    Posted by: m | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 12:52 PM

    In God we Trust

    This non-substantive PC crap is getting old. Focus on substantive issues like the economy, the quality of the educations our children are receiving, and the cost of government.

    Posted by: In God we Trust | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM

    DPendragon

    Pekin High School in 1980 changed their mascot from the Pekin Chinks to the Pekin Dragons.

    If people can only understand that with the naming of a mascot by using only certain ethnic groups, demeans the people as non-human.

    http://wheelingpds.blogspot.com/2008/09/racist-mascots.html

    Posted by: DPendragon | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 01:11 PM

    SFDoug

    Clearly the commenters above have never been on the other side of a stereotype or discrimination. This isn't just some "PC crap." Harmful stereotypes continue to be taught in schools and homes throughout the country, and this has real consequence to people like me.

    First off, I am not saying that we should act as if the "Indian" never was the Tam High mascot. The problem is specifically the way the mascot is depicted (on a "Wanted" poster.)

    But the defenders really have me concerned. You could use the same rationale to support celebrating other "charming traditions" -- like the one at my high school where African-Americans had an "exclusive" seating area at lunch and on the football bench (they were kept off the field.) Or the tradition of a publicly funded organization in my former east coast community that blocked any minorities from applying for membership, in honor of their town's history of KKK activity.

    The way the Indian mascot is shown on the Tam High reunion flyer perpetuates such harm. I had hoped that at least in Marin we had evolved enough to recognize that such stereotypes are part of our history, not our present.

    Posted by: SFDoug | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 01:15 PM

    Mike

    You can't re-write history. This is what the team was called, and no amount of touchy-feely PC "sensitivity" can change that. Nikki, shut up! Teams use powerful images for their team names. Naming a team "Indians" was an homage to Indians, who most people I know would consider to be brave and resourceful and tough. It's like the Fighting Irish or the Boston Celtics. It's a honor, not an insult. Maybe Nikki S. doesn't like sports or just doesn't understand that. The images, like all team mascot images, are cartoons or caricatures, which are not always flattering, but look at the look of fierce resolve on the mascot's face shown in the picture. It's meant to be a young Native American who is tough and determined. That's what comes through when I look at it. The little girl in the bottom corner is just plain cute.

    Posted by: Mike | Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 01:18 PM

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    Posted by:  | 

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    The comments on this are getting really nasty. It would be great if more people would chime-in so that the extremists don't think they are correct.

    Posted via email from Doug's posterous

    A conversation worth joining: sad signs of insensitivity in Marin

    The Pacific Sun's latest "Heroes and Zeroes" column mentions the invitation for a Tam High reunion that prominently features the school's former "American Indian" mascot on a wanted poster. That mascot was replaced a while back because it was recognized as insensitive to Native Americans, among others. Using an "Indian" on a wanted poster may have been tasteless enough, but what really worries me is that the writer of the column, Nikki Silverstein, has gotten absolutely appalling criticism for it.

    People are defending it because it was "part of their history." As Nikki has responded, we could use that same basis to bring back such "charming" icons as "Little Black Sambo." (The comments publicly on PacificSun.com are disturbing. Some comments made by Nikki's "friends" on Facebook are even more so.)

    I wrote a letter to the editor citing "charming traditions" that could be "celebrated" using the same rationale, like the "exclusive" seating area at lunch for African-American students at the high school I went to, or the fire department in a rural Maryland community that blocked any minorities from applying, in honor of their town's history of KKK activity.

    It might be nice if others would join the conversation and help educate these "history buffs." Visit PacificSun.com to submit comments for the web site or letters to the editor for possible publication. As I said in my comments, there are ways the old mascot could have been used without being offensive, but the wanted poster -- and its defenders -- are just plain wrong.

    Columns - Friday, July 23, 2010

    Increase font Increase font
    Decrease font Decrease font
    Adjust text size
    Hero and Zero


    Share

    HERO: The sudden onset of vertigo incapacitated Eric Overholt last Saturday as he walked home from the Marin City Library. Barely able to stand, he grabbed onto a street sign. A woman waiting at the nearby bus stop took his number and contacted his wife. She then gave him water and found a man to help her get Eric over to a bench. The pair waited with him until his wife arrived. Although Eric doesn't have their names, he wants to thank the kind people who assisted him. "For all the bad press Marin City receives, I am glad that I live in a community where strangers are still willing to help others," said Eric. We couldn't have said it better ourselves.

    ZERO: What happened to progressive, tolerant Marin? Last week, a former San Marin High student and his friend allegedly committed a hate crime by spray-painting racist graffiti on school walls. This week, an invitation to the Tam High Class of 1980 reunion came our way—the invite uses an image of the school's now-banned American Indian name and mascot—posted onto an Old West "Wanted" poster of all things—as well as a sexed-up caricature of a female Native American. We hope this insensitivity doesn't become a weekly occurrence in our fine county.—Nikki Silverstein

    Posted via email from Doug's posterous

    Sunday, June 6, 2010

    Excellent piece explaining why targeting Craigslist won't end underage prostitution, and could backfire | AlterNet

    June 4, 2010  |  

    You’d be hard-pressed to find any media-aware person who has never used or heard of Craigslist, the online classifieds that enjoy a uniquely ubiquitous Internet presence all over America and increasingly around the globe.

    Craigslist serves 700 cities in 70 countries. It’s the 11th most visited website in the U.S. and it’s used by 50 million unique users a month, who make 423 million monthly visits and generate billions of page views. Chances are, you or someone you know has bought a used couch, looked for a job, found true love, or tried to get laid using Craigslist.

    These days, Craigslist is getting a different, far less desirable kind of attention: The site’s personal ads have come under aggressive scrutiny and attack from law enforcement officials all over the country. Predictably, a media feeding frenzy has ensued.

    Anti-human trafficking advocates, frustrated by the horrific and seemingly intractable problem of sex trafficking in the U.S., have accused the site of facilitating forced prostitution.

    Meanwhile, for several years, a pack of Attorney Generals, led by Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, has targeted Craigslist with lawsuits and threats, claiming that the site features ads for underage prostitutes and sex trafficking victims. Several have demanded that Craigslist entirely drop their Adult Services section.

    Most recently Jackie Speier, a member of Congress from the Silicon Valley area, held a press conference where she asked Craigslist to halt Adult Services. Speier raised the publicity stakes further, asking the House Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on how Web sites like Craigslist are being used to "facilitate criminal activity."

    You read that right: Speier is not asking for a hearing about the problem of underage sex trafficking. She’s asking Congress to investigate Craigslist, despite the fact that the site has not broken any laws and has made countless changes to address the concerns of law enforcement officials, politicians and human rights activists.

    Here’s how Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster responded to Speiers’ attack:

    I'm confident you will soon realize shutting down portions of Craigslist is no answer, and in fact would be a big step in the wrong direction with respect to the very issues you have raised ... Trafficking and child exploitation are despicable, and while exceedingly rare on Craigslist, any ad facilitating crime is utterly unacceptable, and we work tirelessly with law enforcement to ensure any such victim receives the assistance they deserve and anyone responsible is prosecuted. With 50 million Americans engaging in billions of human interactions each month, the overwhelming majority of which are well-intentioned, the incidence of crime on Craigslist is exceptionally low. However, our tolerance for crime is zero … 

    So what’s the real story here? Do Craigslist’s critics, who seem to have singled out the site as their focus in the fight against teen prostitution, have a point? Or is Craigslist merely a convenient scapegoat?

    The Unique, Unorthodox Power House that is Craigslist

    Over the past decade the wildly successful Craigslist has wreaked havoc in the media industry. The site’s hugely popular free ads have undermined a newspaper industry financially dependent on paid advertising. The online classifieds have hastened the decline of dailies as well as alternative weeklies, creating many unhappy – and more than a few unemployed – people.

    Founder Craig Newmark is a well-known figure that attends many conferences, making himself quite accessible in his own inscrutable way. He is the earnest nerd, the shy eligible bachelor, the non-partisan good-government and journalism advocate who at times as referred to himself politically as a Whig. With characteristic modesty, Newmark says his title is "customer service rep.” Yet Newmark sits atop a potential goldmine. If Craigslist is ever taken public or is sold, Newmark could make billions. Hell, the New York Observer recently listed Newmark as the 14th most powerful real estate figure in NYC, ahead of Donald Trump and Andrew Cuomo, likely the next governor of NY.

    But Newmark is not interested in using the site to turn massive profits. And part of the reason for the media frenzy always surrounding Craigslist is the site’s unorthodox business model, which seems to cause equal parts fascination and frustration.

    The site’s lack of interest in making a huge profit, as well as in offering the latest bells and whistles of the sophisticated technophiles, has made it a target of the business-oriented tech press, led by Wired, which is owned by the mega publishing company Condé Nast. 

    A recent Wired story by Gary Wolfe was headlined "Why Craigslist Is Such a Mess." The article criticizes Craigslist for not trying to up its profits the old fashioned way, by improving services, adding technology fixes, and charging money.

    Wolfe writes that Craigslist reaches nearly a fifth of the nation's adult population every month. "It is the most important community site going and yet the most underdeveloped. Think of any Web feature that has become popular in the past 10 years: Chances are Craigslist has considered it and rejected it. If you try to build a third-party application designed to make Craigslist work better, the management will almost certainly throw up technical roadblocks to shut you down."

    CEO Buckmaster makes it clear why Wired and many seem frustrated: "Craig Newmark and I have been called communists and socialists for putting community ahead of financial considerations. After 15 years of focusing on public service, 50 million people now rely on Craigslist each month for their everyday needs. To the eternal amazement of financial analysts we have never sought to maximize our personal gain. Not because we’re saints, but because valuing service over money is more fulfilling and enjoyable, and has always felt like the right thing to do.”

    Wolfe seems frustrated that Craigslist is free: "Besides offering nearly all of its features for free, it scorns advertising, refuses investment, ignores design, and does not innovate. Ordinarily, a company that showed such complete disdain for the normal rules of business would be vulnerable to competition, but Craigslist has no serious rivals. The glory of the site is its size and its price.” Wolfe and Wired seem exasperated by Newmark's and Ceo Jim Buckmaster's philosophy. "People are good and trustworthy and generally just concerned with getting through the day," Newmark says. Continues Wolfe, describing Newmark’s worldview: “If most people are good and their needs are simple, all you have to do to serve them well is build a minimal infrastructure allowing them to get together and work things out for themselves.” 

    Craigslist’s 50 million users don’t seem to mind.

    The Trafficking of Children

    As for the giant, ongoing flap about Craigslist's Adult Services section: for reasons that seem to reflect how poorly our society deals with its fundamental problems, Craigslist is blamed for crimes committed by people who use their services.

    Craigslist has broken no laws. Not only that, but the site has taken many significant steps to help law enforcement officials capture those who are selling stolen goods, causing physical harm, and engaging in illegal sex acts. Craigslist doesn’t actually have to do any of that, because they are not liable for what appears on the site (the 1996 Communications Decency Act immunizes providers from content posted by users) – but they choose to collaborate with law enforcement anyway. Nevertheless, legal officials and advocates continue to scapegoat Craigslist.

    Craigslist is blamed for serious and intractable social problems like forced prostitution and child sex trafficking, stubborn and disconcerting problems that those actually responsible for making and enforcing laws can't solve – or perhaps have yet to find the will and resources to seriously try.

    The sexual trafficking of young girls is a despicable crime, and increasingly prevalent in our cities and communities. In many cases this horrific problem is going on unchecked. Here is what veteran reporter Dan Rather has to say: "In covering news for more than 60 years, I'd like to think that few stories shock me anymore. But this is one of them. We ran across it late last year and the more we dug, the more disturbing it became. Eighty-year-old men paying a premium to violate teenage girls, sometimes supplied by former drug gangs now into child sex trafficking big time? You've got to be kidding. Nope. That's happening and a lot more along the same lines. The business is booming. One of the worst areas for it runs along lines running roughly from Seattle to Portland, to San Francisco and Los Angeles, to Las Vegas. But no place in the country is immune."

    It’s difficult to assess how many children are involved in underage prostitution -- some conservative estimates peg the number in the range of 100,000 American children who are involved annually, while others say they believe it's closer to 300,000 or more. As one example, in a long investigative report at a micro news site Oakland Local, author Barbara Grady estimates that on any given night there are 100 underage prostitutes on International Boulevard, the main thoroughfare for finding prostitutes in this medium-sized California City.

    Portland, Oregon, one of America's favorite cities and one known for civic pride and great public transportation, is surprisingly also a hot bed for child prostitution, ranking second in the number of child prostitutes that are rescued. The much-admired Portland actually presents a sad example of law enforcement’s failure to attack child trafficking head on.

    Supply and Demand ... and Easy, Safe Money

    Like most illegal activities, prostitution in general, and the trafficking of underage girls specifically, is fundamentally a question of supply and demand. In the case of teenage trafficking, supply may be increasing due to complex social and law enforcement factors. For example, it has been reported that increasingly, men in the drug trade are switching to human trafficking. Some speculate that many dealers have left the drug trade for pimping because more money could be made in trafficking, but also because there’s far less pressure from the cops --- there is little risk of arrest, and most prostitutes are unwilling to testify against their pimps.

    It is a very lucrative business, according to Doug Justus of the Portland police department, who is quoted in Rather’s story. 

    An average pimp with one kid will make between $800 and $l,000 a day. That's seven days a week, 30 days a month," he said. And the pimps usually have a stable of young girls. No wonder so many criminals in the drug trade have turned to it which they have in droves. There's less chance of being caught, less chance of being prosecuted if caught, lighter sentences -- if any -- if convicted.

    In his recent TV show and article, Dan Rather took a look at the effort that Portland puts into this issue, when compared with the drug war. He notes:

    There is, and has been for a long time, a national "War on Drugs." There isn't one on child prostitution and what amounts to a slave trade. Only feeble efforts at best. Justus, the Portland police detective is frustrated that the Portland police have only two full-time vice investigators, compared to dozens of drug investigators ."I'm not a politician. I'm just a cop. But if I'm a criminal and I got busted for drugs and I had a regional (drug) task force over here. And there's another task force over there, and there, and then I know there's only two vice investigators in the city of Portland, let me think. I think I'll sell women because what are the chances of me being caught?"


    Consider the billions of dollars that are invested in the drug war, and the militarization of police departments across the land as a result of the overwrought fear of terrorism that has spread into towns and small cities all across the land. And consider the firepower: Our cities and communities are armed to the teeth to bust pot and cocaine dealers, and be prepared for the extraordinarily unlikely chance that they will be involved with terrorism. Meanwhile, a huge number of vulnerable kids are being violated and abused every day. Might we also consider what would happen if some of police departments’ firepower were aimed at pimps? If cops broke down doors of pimps that abuse kids with AK 47s in the dark of night in full combat gear? Might that not help slow down sex trafficking (not that I think it is a good idea to use that kind of police tactics in general)?  But where are our priorities?

    Why Scapegoating Craigslist Is Dangerous

    Scapegoating Craigslist while ignoring more significant problems is not only misguided – it’s also dangerous. The publicity creates the illusion that the problem of trafficking is being addressed, when it's not. Focusing on Craigslist avoids real and substantive solutions to the problem, and obscures what appears to be our society's fundamental inability to deal with child prostitution.

    The reasons for the social failure to attack trafficking are no doubt multifaceted, though they probably have at their core elements of sexism and racism. A San Francisco psychologist, who preferred to remain anonymous, suggested that male ambivalence or outright avoidance of dealing with illegal sex issues can be in part explained by the high number of men of all classes who have had sexual relations with prostitutes at one time or another. According to the recent survey data (University of Chicago Life and Health Study), about 16 percent of men in the US have visited a prostitute at least once in their lifetime. According to Dr. Teela Sanders, a senior lecturer at the University of Leeds, and the author of Paying For Pleasure: Men Who Buy Sex, nearly one in three men will buy sex at some point in his life ... and we're not talking porn.  These numbers suggest that somewhere between 15 and 40 million men have used a prostitute at some point in their life. That is quite a sizable market. Perhaps some feel culpability. 

    Many elected officials seem addicted to explaining and addressing problems with press releases, which are cheap and require very little work. I don't doubt that they are outraged by what they hear and see -- and of course it is disturbing to hear detailed stories of pimps who have benefited from Craigslist.   But do these media hounds really think that with all of the money being made, and the hundreds of other sites where prostitutes advertise, undermining Craigslist, or getting them to abolish adult services, will seriously address the problem? In fact, all it could accomplish is make it a little harder to catch abusers and harm Craigslist, seemingly the only online classifieds acting in the public interest. It may even send the problem deeper underground, where it will be less visible.

    In fact, hundreds of other sites on the web feature sex ads, the most prominent of which is BackPage, owned by the Village Voice company -- more on that in a moment. These other sites get very little attention, in part because Craigslist is a kind of media goldmine for those in search of publicity to pump up their career or their cause. The media seems little more than a Pavlov dog when it comes to Craigslist. Piling on Craigslist has become a bit of a national sport – but one that represents a dangerous trend for teens and adults forced into sex slavery.

    AG Blumenthal and His Fellow Attorney Generals'  Embarrassing Ignorance of the Law

    The most visible, and perhaps influential national law enforcement official going after Craigslist has been Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who just happens to be running for the Senate. The Blumenthal candidacy is filled with hope for Democrats, who are desperate to hang on to a significant majority in the Senate. Chris Dodd, the incumbent, retired, presumably because he couldn't get reelected, paving the way for Blumenthal in a a super high priority race. Blumenthal also happens to be the candidate who has lied repeatedly about his service in Vietnam, claiming he was there during the war as a Marine, when he actually avoided the draft for 5 years, signing up at the last minute for the Marine Reserves when he became vulnerable to the draft. In the end he never left Washington, D.C .

    Most recently Blumenthal, who has led overzealous AGs into battle against Craigslist many times, subpoenaed the company for information regarding their finances, dramatically declaring, "The Craigslist brothel business seems to be booming."

    His tactics were questionable to say the least.

    "The Attorney Generals' war on Craigslist is a"bit embarrassing," says Electronic Frontier Foundation lawyer Matthew Zimmerman, given that their position requires familiarity with existing laws. "They're engaging in an easy PR move where they get to look tough on crime. Problem with that is, it's not the law."

    According to Zimmerman Craigslist is protected from liability even if they know that the content posted is illegal, and even if they profit from it. "The subpoena is a trumped up excuse to go in and harass Craigslist and continue to make their life difficult," says Zimmerman.

    In 2008, Blumenthal sent a letter to Craigslist signed by 40 AGs demanding the site crack down on ads for illegal activities. After negotiations with Blumenthal, the company instituted several changes to combat illegal uses of the site: users would have to provide a working phone number and pay a 5-10 dollar fee with a valid credit card. Craigslist also agreed to collaborate with law enforcement and the National Center for Missing or Exploited Kids to help hunt down illegal traffickers.

    The agreement did not dissuade Cook Country Sheriff Thomas Dart from suing Craigslist a mere 4 months later. Dart not only asked the court to shut down the "erotic services" (predecessor to “Adult Services”) section, but demanded the site pay the Sheriff department's $100,000 investigation into illegal activity on the site. U.S. District Court Judge John Grady was not impressed, throwing out the suit and saying that Craigslist was not to blame for users violating the site's policies.

    Undeterred by precedent, South Carolina AG Henry McMaster decided to one-up Dart in May of 2009 by threatening to prosecute Craigslist executives if they refused to drop "erotic services". Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster replied in a blog post that McMaster's suit was baseless. Nevertheless, bowing to pressure after the highly publicized murder of a 26 year old massuesse who'd advertised on the site, Craigslist agreed to scrap Erotic Services and replace it with a new section called Adult Services that would be closely monitored for illegal content. McMaster wasn't satisfied, insisting he'd go ahead with his "investigation." When Craigslist slapped the AG with a counter-suit and a restraining order, McMaster improbably declared victory, saying the site would now adhere to higher standards.

    Many advocates for exploited children and trafficking victims are fiercely fighting forced and under-aged prostitution any way they can.

    But like the AGs, in order to get their issue in the news, to sound the alarm, to increase their fundraising potential, they primarily go after Craigslist. Amanda Kloer, an anti trafficking activist, who has a petition up at Change.org to pressure Craigslists about Adult Services, told AlterNet "Craigslist is by no means the only group that human trafficking victims are advertised through. The Washington Post still has huge sections of advertisements for Asian massage parlors that are shut down for trafficking. Yet WP hasn’t responded to requests to get rid of those ads. Backpage also run sex ads." So why focus on Craigslist?

    "I think Craigslist is not the only one, but they’re the best known. I can’t say there are more ads for trafficked people on Craigslist than other places. But it’s a big organization, and getting them to change their policies would effect more change."

    The Craigslist Response and Those Other Sites

    One of the stranger aspects of attacks on Craigslist is the fact that traffickers are often caught through the site.

    Craigslist emphasizes that it has gone out of its way to work closely with law enforcement to crack down on illegal sex ads. (It must be said here that adults voluntarily engaging in sex work – though there’ also opportunity for exploitation there – are in a totally different realm than children or those forced into prostitution. In fact, it has been argued that sites like Craigslist may provide a safer venue for adult sex workers.)

    When I ask Jim Buckmaster why Craigslist is being targeted so frequently, his response was this:

    No good deed goes unpunished! It's surprising that after all the improvements we have made Craigslist continues to be singled out for criticism (much of it directed at those very improvements!) while countless sites specializing in utterly unmoderated adult ads continue to get a free pass from politicians and advocacy groups. It leads us to wonder whether, if we hadn't issued a Joint Statement with the Attorneys General, and had refrained from adopting all of the protective measures we've taken, whether all of this could have been avoided.

    Buckmaster adds: "Why is it of no interest that companies other than Craigslist, with far more such ads, graphic and unmoderated, are not screening them at all, nor have they taken any of the other protective measures we have taken? Lagging behind (to mention but a few) are the large mainstream internet portals, the major search engines, large telephone companies (yellow pages), major newspapers, chain operators of alternative weeklies, etc — which derive vastly more revenue from adult service ads than Craigslist, while doing far less than Craigslist to combat exploitation/trafficking.”

    Buckmaster insists: "Each ad submitted to adult services on Craigslist is manually screened by one or more human reviewers. Ads that blatantly advertise prostitution are summarily rejected. For example, most if not all of the adult services ads featured by the Village Voice Inc. Backpage ( which carries more adult ads than Craigslist in most US cities) would be rejected by our manual reviewers, and in fact quite a few of them would be submitted to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Kids cyber tipline "

    It should be noted that the Village Voice Co. was taken over in 2006 by New Times, a company which owned 10 weekly newspapers, operating out of Phoenix Arizona, and owned by Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin. The owners of the Voice, primarily David Schneiderman, sold their 5 papers to New Times, giving the company unprecedented consolidation of 14 papers in most key US markets including New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Miami, Houston, Seattle. New Times decided that the Village Voice brand was stronger than theirs and called the consolidated new company Village Voice Inc.

    Here are some ads from BackPage, supplied by Buckmaster:


    Here’s an ad with photos (NSFW) of bare genitalia (Craigslist reviewers reject ads with nude pictures), describing specific sex acts offered (Craigslist reviewers reject ads with sexual language or code words):
    ******Ev3Ry !!! M@N’s!///!!% W3tt ***Dre@M __ CuM%TruE*** - 24
    Watch closely as i bounce my fat luscious, juicy apple bottom booty up & down ure big c*ck!!! 80Roses** Quk $e$$ion 100Roses** Half Hr 140Roses** Full Hr200 Roses.

    This ad offers “greek” in exchange for 100 “kisses” in the ad title (Craigslist reviewers reject such ads):
    ♥ ♥ SexY EXxXOTiC BuSTii B@RB!E (( g/r/3/3/k)) ♥ ♥ 100 kisses - 21

    The following ad, if submitted to CL’s review team, would have been reported to NCMEC’s cybertipline:
    ** I JuST TuRNeD 18 YeSTeRDaYY** FiNaLLY LeGal - 18
    my parents are at work and im all alone jus waiting for someone to cum inside and invade my young, barely legal, juicy, suculant love nest. 

    In addition to the many steps the site has taken to discourage illegal postings (Buckmaster has listed their policies here) Craigslist helps law enforcement by creating the opportunity for stings that have helped take down human trafficking operations.

    As Valleywag  pointed out during the Sheriff Thomas Dart's lawsuit, Dart's department used Craigslist to bust a prostitution ring, leading to the arrests of 254 women and men. Komo news reported that Everett Washington's Vice Squad depends on Craigslist to help find and arrest sex workers. All officers have to do is answer the ads, set up a meeting and make an arrest if sex for money is offered. A Canadian police chief has said that his regularly uses Craigslist to investigate ads they find suspicious, leading to stings that find girls as young as 15-16 being pimped out.

    In an open letter Buckmaster pointed out that dropping the adult services section would actually hurt more than help curb illegal activity: "For the sake of rescuing victims and prosecuting criminals, is it really a good idea to eliminate the only venue for adult service ads that is highly responsive to law enforcement? The only venue that seeks out nonprofit groups and readily adopts their suggestions?"

    Scapegoating Is Not the Answer

    Blaming Craigslist for the problem takes those responsible for fixing the problem off the hook. Political opportunists of every stripe go after Craigslist because it is an international brand with instant recognition, and the corporate media tends to salivate when it comes to stories about sex and law breaking related to Craigslist.

    It is hard to understand how people think that coming down on Craigslist or having them eliminate their adult personals will solve sex trafficking. Unless more resources are invested in making life difficult for the johns who use underage prostitutes, and until heavy heat comes down on the pimps who seduce, manipulate, and sometimes kidnap young girls and make them perform against their will, this problem will grow. That is where the focus, the energy, and the resources must be applied.

    If public officials don't target the abusers more aggressively, or intervene with the kids, nothing will change. Craigslist is only the intermediary, as are all personal ads. Does anyone really think if there was no Craigslist, suddenly child prostitution will go away? Not likely. With the large amounts of profit in play, there will always be a marketing, advertising, communication strategy to match the supply with the demand. In the end, primarily going after Craigslist probably makes the pimps very happy.

    Full disclosure: AlterNet was the recipient of one general support contribution from Craigslist in 2009. Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

    This is a really good article that explains the real role of classified ads in general, and Craigslist in particular, in human trafficking and other abhorrent crimes. It also cogently explains why politicians who are trying to blame Craigslist are sadly misguided.

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    Wednesday, June 2, 2010

    Mill Valley Beerworks - open since last week.

    via tweetie

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    This doesn't sound good to me: SFGate-State poised to OK supertoxic pesticide

    Farmers planting strawberries and other crops in California will soon have to contend with cancer-causing poison instead of bugs, worms and fungus if regulators get their wish.

    The California Department of Pesticide Regulation has proposed registering methyl iodide as a pesticide in California to the dismay of scientists and environmental groups, who say it is so toxic that even chemists are reluctant to handle it.

    The chemical will become legal for growers to use after a 60-day comment period ending June 29 unless there is some kind of public outcry.

    "This is one of the most egregious pesticides out there," said Sarah Aird, the state field organizer for Californians for Pesticide Reform, a coalition of watchdog groups opposed to the use of potentially harmful chemicals. "It is really, really toxic. It is actually used in the laboratory to induce cancer cells."

    Methyl iodide was approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2007 for use as a fumigant over the protests of more than two dozen California legislators and 54 scientists, including five Nobel laureates, who signed a letter opposing registration of the chemical.

    Bush-era decision

    It was approved as a replacement for methyl bromide, which experts wanted phased out because its fumes waft into the atmosphere and damage the ozone layer.

    Appeals have recently been made to the Obama administration to overturn the Bush-era decision.

    Methyl iodide is now licensed for use in 47 states, but it is expensive and used only sparingly in Florida and the Carolinas, mostly on strawberries and occasionally on tomatoes and peppers. Eleven states have used it at least once, according to researchers. No problems have been documented, but very few studies have been conducted, Aird and others said.

    California is considered a key battleground in the fight against methyl iodide because agriculture is a major part of the economy. The substance, produced by Arysta LifeScience Corp., is used primarily to prepare strawberry fields for planting because that fruit is particularly susceptible to soil-borne pests.

    The stuff is normally mixed into the dirt and covered with tarps. It kills weed seeds, insects, microscopic worms, bacteria and fungal diseases that infect plant roots.

    "Fumigants, including methyl iodide, sterilize soil prior to planting," said Lea Brooks, spokeswoman for the Department of Pesticide Regulation. "It is injected into soil. It is not applied onto plants or fruit."

    Brooks said the department is aware that methyl iodide is toxic, but management concluded that it could be used safely as long as protective measures were in place. If it gets registered, she said, anyone who uses the chemical will have to set up buffer zones, limit application rates and treat only a limited amount of acreage at a time. She said California's exposure limits are twice as strict as EPA's.

    Flirting with disaster

    Susan Kegley, a consulting scientist for Pesticide Action Network, a nonprofit public interest group in San Francisco, said approving methyl iodide would be a flirtation with disaster no matter how many safeguards are in place.

    "This stuff just kills everything," said Kegley, a chemist, who pointed out that even low doses have caused neurological damage and fetal death in laboratory animals. "It is a known carcinogen."

    Methyl iodide has been linked to thyroid disease, including cancerous tumors that can also affect the lungs and brain, she said. If tarps typically used to cover the treated soil were to blow off, she said, the substance could waft into the air.

    "We are likely to see a greater incidence of thyroid disease with use of this chemical," said Kegley, who wears double gloves and uses syringes, a fume hood and ventilation devices whenever she handles the chemical in the lab. "The only good thing about methyl iodide is that it doesn't deplete the ozone layer."

    What's really baffling, Kegley said, is that the state's own scientists concluded that the chemical posed a potential risk to public health. The department then appointed an outside review panel, which essentially came out with the same results.

    Reviewers' assessment

    Brooks said the department incorporated many of the review panel's suggestions in the final risk assessment.

    "However, the members are experts in assessing pesticide risks, not in regulatory risk management that leads to decisions on registration," Brooks wrote in an e-mail to The Chronicle. "Panel members were not familiar with the many options and measures that can be put into place by risk managers to avoid unsafe exposure levels."

    Pesticide opponents believe Arysta lobbyists put pressure on legislators and the regulatory agency to approve the pesticide.

    "This is one of these chemicals that chemists give great respect to," Kegley said. "Allowing releases into the soil by farmers and others without training in safe handling techniques is ludicrous."

    E-mail Peter Fimrite at pfimrite@sfchronicle.com.

    This article appeared on page C - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

    Credit @jonbonne for pointing this out.

    There's got to be a better, safer way to manage pests than a chemical that kills everything in its reach.

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    Sunday, May 30, 2010

    Being alert for terrorists doesn't mean being alert for Muslims

    I am disappointed to see another example of a person being judged by appearance. Although there is no evidence that the individual's placement on the no-fly list was based on his looks, the MSNBC report on the incident quotes a Mexican official describing the suspect as "Muslim looking." 

    That is little different from the highly offensive comment that a person "looks Jewish."

    (A later report indicates that the man was arrested because of an outstanding warrant, according to the Transportation Security Administration. Clearly there is more to this story, since an outstanding warrant is not usually a reason to land a flight early - a very costly action.)

    Just yesterday I had a conversation with a friend who had no idea that "black people could be Jewish." As I explained to her, not only is it possible, but she's met at least one of my friends who is both African-American and proudly Jewish. I think I may have gone a step too far in this conversation by further explaining that there's a very real possibility that Moses was black, and there is convincing evidence that we are all descendants of one African woman (we'll call her Eve.) DNA analysis is an amazing tool to learn about our origins.

    The truth is that we must use every means possible to identify possible terrorists before they kill innocent people. And it is true that the United States has many enemies in the Muslim world - for many reasons new and old. 

    However, the Muslim faith is a global faith, with many good, peaceful people practicing it and believing in its tenets. Only a small minority subscribe to the violent jihadism of the September 11th hijackers and other militants. The fact is that many of the militant Muslims are not Arab at all. 

    Let's not confuse being alert with being prejudiced. If we do, we will continue to focus on the wrong people.

    Posted via email from Doug's posterous

    Friday, May 14, 2010

    Why helmet laws protect MY freedom #tcot

    I just heard an Obama-hater on the radio complaining that government shouldn't do things like require him to wear a motorcycle helmet. To him and others like him, here's why you are wrong.

    From my nearly 10 years as a firefighter and emergency medical technician at a busy fire station near I-95 in Maryland, I know first- hand how much motorcycle and bicycle helmets -and seat belts in cars - reduce the severity of injuries.

    The guy on the radio may think it's his life to put at risk by shunning proven safety devices. While that is true, the cost of any accident he gets into gets paid for by, guess who? Other taxpayers.

    Think about it. A highway-speed head injury requires transfer to a Level 1 or 2 trauma center. Those air ambulance helicopters cost a lot to keep at the ready and to respond. Most trauma centers are public hospitals - it costs 10s of thousands to maintain an expert trauma team available 24/7. All of the other people involved in an emergency response - firefighters, medics, police, highway maintenance - are paid from tax dollars.

    Plus, an accident with a severe injury usually ties up traffic. That costs money to everyone stuck in the backup.

    I have a deal for the guy on the radio and others like him: go ahead, ride without a helmet, don't buckle your seat belt, do what you like. But if you get hurt, don't look to the government or my tax dollars to rescue you.

    Sent from my iPhone

    Posted via email from Doug's posterous

    Sunday, May 9, 2010

    .@educatedpalates this is as close as I can get to sharing it from 400 miles away

    via tweetie

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    Here's a new (to me) way to enjoy rhubarb. @corralboca

    via tweetie

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    The many worlds of downtown Los Angeles

    I'm staying this weekend in downtown Los Angeles, as my local friends advised me that this is the new, hip part of town. Having spent my teenage years in the Los Angeles area, I am stunned by the transformation. Back then, downtown completely cleared out after office hours. There were no homes in the downtown core, and the closest thing to residents were the homeless on the city's very real Skid Row. 

    Skid Row is very much still here, made even more depressing by the resurgence nearby and by the darkness of the street left as the Greyhound bus depot has been shuttered. The bus depot was always a depressing spot, but at least it was bustling and relatively safe around the clock. Now, the buses arrive and depart from Union Station, the hub of Southern California's rather remarkable, new transportation network. 

    Literally steps away from a street lined with makeshift tents in which society's forgotten try to stay warm, hipsters line up for the hottest cocktail lounges, artisan food and musicians helping drown out the loud conversation with dulcet tones. Former bank branches are finding a new purpose, with hours completely opposite of traditional bankers' hours.

    Many of the buildings in downtown are the originals. Walking around, it's easy to see the merchant history here. I think most of the stores were already closed by the time my family moved here in the 1970s, but building after building has the distinct design of a grand department store. Only a couple of them have historic markers on them. 

    Many are sadly run down. The other category of building that is hard to miss is banking. Right now I am looking at the Bank of Italy building, which I believe was built in 1921, back when A.P. Gianini was running the bank that would become Bank of America. The building is in bad shape. Its artful metal doorways are in disrepair, windows are boarded or tagged with graffiti. It even looks like an upper window or two may be missing. There is so much potential, but apparently not enough money to make this historic building part of downtown's transformation. (For an interesting article on why the Bank of Italy building remains in decay, see http://www.ladowntownnews.com/articles/2010/02/17/news/doc4b75ef9f3dc5e711360635.txt.)

    One of the other striking aspects of downtown's transformation is the bustling shopping district that has emerged, primarily catering to Latinos, and ranging from discounters like Big Lots and Payless Shoe Source to jewelry stores. Walking around on a Sunday morning, I encountered well dressed men and women, lots of children, and a few sidewalk preachers.  It felt very much like a real neighborhood, not like a downtown business district at all.

    The city still has a long way to go, and there are many people here who need help, but I think Los Angeles has grown beyond the old description of it as "suburbs in search of a city."

    Posted via email from Doug's posterous

    A hoppy finish to a happy night. Green Flash West Coast IPA. Label says it is "extravagently hopped." it's good.

    via tweetie

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    Sunday, April 18, 2010

    If the right-wing Washington Times is alarmed at this, we all should be. (HT @dangillmor)

    By THE WASHINGTON TIMES

    Federal security workers are now free to snoop through more than just your undergarments and luggage at the airport. Thanks to a recent series of federal court decisions, the digital belongings of international fliers are now open for inspection. This includes reading the saved e-mails on your laptop, scanning the address book on your iPhone or BlackBerry and closely scrutinizing your digital vacation snapshots.

    Unlike the more common confiscations of dangerous Evian bottles and fingernail clippers, these searches are not being done in the name of safety. The digital seizures instead are part of a disturbing trend of federal agencies using legal gimmicks to sidestep Fourth Amendment constitutional protections. This became clear in an April 8 court ruling that found admissible the evidence obtained by officials who had peeped at a passenger's laptop files at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston.

    According to court documents, FBI agents had identified an individual suspected of downloading child pornography on an Internet chat room. The G-men, however, did not want to take their evidence before a judge to obtain a search warrant, as the Constitution requires. Instead, they flagged the suspect's passport and asked officials at the Department of Homeland Security to seize and search his computer at the airport - without a warrant. Three incriminating images were found during the examination, but this case is not about whether a particular person is a scumbag. It's about abusing a principle that applies to all Americans.

    U.S. District Judge Gray H. Miller found in this case that neither probable cause, justification nor warrant were required to seize and examine the suspect's laptop. Judge Miller, in accord with a 9th Circuit appellate ruling handed down two years ago, explained that "the court finds that reviewing the files of a computer does not rise to the level of invasion of the privacy and dignity of the individual to make the search non-routine."

    In other words, simply because a U.S. citizen is returning from a foreign country by airplane, the government thinks it is a "routine" matter to download sensitive business documents, personal correspondence and any other information that might be saved on a laptop or cell phone, regardless of whether there is any reason to suspect the traveler of a crime.

    The danger of this chain of reasoning is magnified by the courts' expansive definition of "border," which now includes checkpoints operating up to 100 miles from Canada or Mexico. Those traveling on the highway between Los Angeles and Phoenix, for example, may find themselves stopped by Department of Homeland Security officers who, literally, ask travelers to show their papers. Drug dogs also can be brought in to search vehicles without probable cause.

    The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right of Americans to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects" from unreasonable and unwarranted government intrusion. It is obvious that this right is meant to apply equally to papers that happen to be stored in digital form on a personal hard drive. Such protections do not disappear merely because one happens to be at a real - or imaginary - border.

    Because the courts have been derelict in their duty to uphold this fundamental right, it is up to Congress to prohibit the thinly veiled attempts to create Constitution-free zones where Americans find their privacy invaded.

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    Police raid student newspaper offices, seize 900 photos | Richmond Times-Dispatch

    Police raid offices of JMU’s paper, seize 900 photos

    By Mark Bowes
    Published: April 17, 2010
    vote
    now
    Buzz up!

    Up to a dozen police officers led by Rockingham County's commonwealth's attorney raided the offices of James Madison University's student-run newspaper yesterday and seized more than 900 photos taken of last weekend's off-campus, violence-marred party.

    Commonwealth's Attorney Marsha L. Garst, armed with a search warrant and accompanied by the officers, showed up unannounced about 10:30 a.m., said Katie Thisdell, editor-in-chief of The Breeze.

    "She said if you don't release all of them, we are prepared to take everything out of this office -- all the computers, the cameras, documents, everything," Thisdell said last night

    Thisdell said she complied after consulting with the newspaper's general manager, a university employee, and allowed police to download the images onto DVDs. She said not all the photos were related to Springfest, an annual party that drew about 8,000 people this year -- not all of them JMU students.

    More than 30 people were arrested and 42 injuries were reported when police with riot shields used pepper spray and tear gas to break up last Saturday's party. Property damage was extensive, authorities said.

    Thisdell said a member of Garst's office called her Thursday requesting the photos. Thisdell advised that the newspaper's policy was to release only those photos that appeared on its website or were published in the paper.

    Garst couldn't be reached for comment last night.

    Thisdell said The Breeze has accepted an offer to be legally represented by the Student Press Law Center in Arlington County, a nonprofit organization that defends student journalists' First Amendment rights. The law center yesterday demanded that Rockingham authorities immediately return the "improperly seized" unpublished photos.

    Attorney Frank D. LoMonte, the center's executive director, said in a prepared statement that the search likely violated the federal Privacy Protection Act, which makes it unlawful to search newsrooms for unpublished newsgathering materials.

    "To intimidate student journalists with a massive show of force and with no time to consult with legal counsel is grossly improper," LoMonte said.


    Contact Mark Bowes at (804) 649-6450 or mbowes@timesdispatch.com .

    Advertisement

    View More: rockingham county,james madison university,harrisonburg,
    Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:

    Reader Reactions

    Voice your opinion by posting a comment.
    Flag Comment Posted by Robo on April 18, 2010 at 7:43 am

    Rockingham Co CA & Police = NAZIS

    Simple formula.

    Where is the outrage at this
    crime?

    Flag Comment Posted by Will on April 17, 2010 at 11:01 pm

    Badger: You shouldn’t blame the RTD for saying the raid occurred yesterday, and claim the reporter was on drugs. . .  That’s exactly what the student editor told reporters and what was reported in every other state newspaper. The search warrant was executed yesterday (Friday) just like it says in the story.

    I guess you get your knowledge from some secret Badger Times or something.

    “By Jordan Fifer | The Roanoke Times
    At least half a dozen police officers and the Rockingham County commonwealth�s attorney raided the offices of James Madison University�s student newspaper Friday, confiscating hundreds of photos of an off-campus riot last weekend, the paper�s editor said.“

    And Badger, the First Amendment might be an issue. More germane, if you’d read to the end of the story, is the Privacy Protection Act, a specific federal law to protect newsrooms from this sort of blanket fishing expedition to cease all their equipment, etc.—which is exactly what the CA threatened to do. If this act is in play, then the evidence she has ceased won’t be able to be used in a court of law. Dumb.

    Flag Comment Posted by badger on April 17, 2010 at 10:44 pm

    Uh, folks…This happened like 3-4 days ago! And the Times-Dispatch is just posting it as news today? The search warrant was not executed “yesterday” as Mark Bowes reports. (He needs to lay off the sleeping pills).

    Violation of the First Amendment? Oh lady, you’re way off. Well there’s much that this pitiful RT-D version doesn’t give you, so maybe you truly don’t know.
    #1. The Breeze refused to let CA Garst look at the photos, when Garst first asked.
    #2. The photos are evidence in a criminal investigation.
    #3. Many of the photos are of last weekend’s riot, where JMU students—and non-JMU students—pelted Harrisonburg police officers (and others) with rocks, bottles & cans.
    #4. The ER there was overflowing all day & all night from inuries. One guy had to be flown to UVA hospital he was hurt so bad (and is why 8 people were charged with Malicious Wounding by Mob).

    So this is a simple ‘free speech issue’, huh? Hey I got a tip—Know what actually happened before you go off on some high-school civics class tangent!!

    Flag Comment Posted by Will on April 17, 2010 at 10:25 pm

    The Roberts Court, Inc., has already decided that students don’t have rights in Morse v. Frederick. What’s the big deal?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_v._Frederick

    Flag Comment Posted by ramgrl on April 17, 2010 at 10:11 pm

    Could there BE a clearer case of first amendment rights violation? WTF was the CA thinking here? And going in herself with the police? Thats a CLEAR breech of separation between law enforcement and the prosecution. Theres no way she can be involved in the hearing for this case because it would be a huge conflict of interest. She just put herself on the same level as the officers there, as a witness. What a moron! Did she completely miss the first year of law school?? I agree with the last post here. What IS this state coming to with the violations of Constitutional rights every five seconds. It’s embarassing!

    Flag Comment Posted by gnomic on April 17, 2010 at 12:09 pm

    Is the the County Attorney incompetent and ignorant of the law, or does he think that he has some special exemption? His job is to uphold the law, not violate it. I suspect this is a result of the culture of the current state leadership that believes that it can ignore federal laws and the US constitution because they don’t agree that all citizens are created equal and that the Commonwealth of Virgina is subject to federal laws. I wonder what rights or laws they will decide that to violate next. And the word you are looking for is “facist.“ That’s what you call a state that superceeds your rights at a whim. Jefferson would be so ashamed of the leaders today.

    Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on April 17, 2010 at 3:52 am

    This is America.  The Police can do whatever they want.

    Page 1 of 1

    Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

    • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
    • Respect others.
    • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
    • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
    Click here to post a comment.

    This is a very serious breach of First Amendment principles. The government cannot raid a newsroom unless they've exhausted all other reasonable means to get what they are looking for. Please help spread the word about this serious incident and consider donating (http://partners.guidestar.org/controller/searchResults.gs?action_donateReport...) to the Student Press Law Center (http://www.splc.org.)

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    Friday, April 16, 2010

    How can product called "Smartfood" have 20g of fat per serving?

    Just looked at a package of Frito-Lay's Smartfood White Cheddar Popcorn. Despite the name and the packaging that touts the virtues of air-popped popcorn, all the goop added to this otherwise healthy food loads it up with salt and fat - 20 grams of fat in one serving. That's about two-thirds of the amount of fat that ought to be in an entire day's consumption.

    In my opinion, there's nothing smart about Smartfood. I'll pass on it.

    Sent from my iPhone

    Posted via email from Doug's posterous

    Monday, April 12, 2010

    I know I'll hear abt this from my trainer but this fresh fettucini w/spring vegetables at Piazza D'Angelo is tasty!

    via tweetie

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    WHO admits shortcomings in handling flu pandemic | Reuters

    WHO admits shortcomings in handling flu pandemic

    GENEVA
    Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:53pm EDT

    An epidemiologist examines the sample taken from a patient thought to be infected with influenza A (H1N1) virus, formerly referred to as swine flu, in a government laboratory in Leon Guanajuato, some 320 km (200 miles) northwest of Mexico City, April 30, 2009. REUTERS/Mario Armas

    An epidemiologist examines the sample taken from a patient thought to be infected with influenza A (H1N1) virus, formerly referred to as swine flu, in a government laboratory in Leon Guanajuato, some 320 km (200 miles) northwest of Mexico City, April 30, 2009.

    Credit: Reuters/Mario Armas

    GENEVA (Reuters) - The World Health Organization conceded shortcomings on Monday in its handling of the H1N1 swine flu pandemic, including a failure to communicate uncertainties about the new virus as it swept around the globe.

    World  |  Health

    Keiji Fukuda, the WHO's top influenza expert, said the U.N. agency's six-phase system for declaring a pandemic had sown confusion about the flu bug which was ultimately not as deadly as the widely-feared avian influenza.

    "The reality is there is a huge amount of uncertainty (in a pandemic). I think we did not convey the uncertainty. That was interpreted by many as a non-transparent process," Fukuda said.

    He was addressing a three-day meeting of 29 external flu experts called to review WHO's handling of the first influenza pandemic in 40 years.

    LINKS TO DRUG COMPANIES

    Critics have said the WHO created panic about the swine flu virus, which turned out to be moderate in its effect, and caused governments to stockpile vaccines which went unused.

    Some questioned its links to the pharmaceutical industry after companies like GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi-Aventis profited from producing H1N1 vaccine.

    Kenya's delegation criticized the United Nations agency for failing to ensure that developing countries received a fair share of vaccines developed against the virus.

    "It is not fair to have new vaccines and medicines and then they are so expensive that most poor people in developing countries can't access them," Kenya's delegate said. "This is not a situation that should be tolerated at all."

    To date, 31 poorer countries including Afghanistan, Cuba, Kenya and Myanmar have received limited supplies of vaccine donated by drug companies and Western countries, via the WHO.

    India's delegation suggested that in public health emergencies, patents on vital drugs should be lifted in line with the World Trade Organization's TRIPS agreement on intellectual property.

    H1N1, which emerged in Mexico and the United States almost exactly a year ago, has killed 17,770 people in 213 countries, according to WHO, which declared a pandemic under way in June.

    The WHO will need another year or two after the pandemic is declared over to determine a final death rate from the virus, which is certain to be much higher. The pandemic is still officially under way.

    FEAR AND CONFUSION

    The World Bank has estimated that countries have spent $4 billion to prepare pandemic preparedness plans and respond to the outbreaks, according to the U.S. delegation to the talks.

    "Influenza is a formidable and unpredictable opponent. The threat of a severe pandemic has not decreased," the U.S. delegate said.

    The separate but highly lethal H5N1 bird flu virus -- which has killed 60 percent of those infected since 2003 -- "injected a high level of fear about the next pandemic," Fukuda said.

    It had been difficult to meet public demands for advice as the H1N1 virus spread quickly across borders and blogs generated speculation and criticism, according to the WHO official.

    One big surprise had been that only one dose of vaccine was needed to provide immunity, whereas most planning had been built around two doses being required, he said.

    This meant that some countries were left struggling with an oversupply of unused vaccines while poorer ones had little or no access to supplies.

    "Confusion about phases and level of severity remains a very vexing issue," Fukuda said, referring to the WHO's six-level scale for pandemics which takes into account the geographic spread of a virus but not its severity.

    (Editing by Jonathan Lynn and Michael Roddy)

     

    Add a Comment
    *We welcome comments that advance the story directly or with relevant tangential information. We try to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam and review comments frequently to ensure they meet our standards. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters.

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    Sunday, April 4, 2010

    Hannity calls tea party GOPers “Tim McVeigh wannabees” — and they cheer! - Daily Kos TV (beta)

    Transcript:

    HANNITY: See, can I add one thing? I think we won the debate.

    DREIER: We did win the debate.

    HANNITY: When you think about the vast majorities that they have in Congress and they had to bribe, backroom deals, corruption, that’s all because the tea party movement, the people — all these Tim McVeigh wannabes here.

    (CHEERS AND APPLAUSE)

    HANNITY: Guys, thank you for being here.

    (CROSSTALK)

    h/t: MoxNewsDotCom.

    I don't know about you, but cheering at the mention of terrorist Tim McVeigh's name - especially used in this context - is nothing short of scary. What in the world is happening that makes Sean Hannity or anyone else think this is OK?

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous

    Dr refusing care to Obama supporters admits he doesn't know what he's against « Alan Colmes' Liberaland

    Dr. Jack Cassell, the Orlando urologist who put a sign on his door letting patients know he doesn’t want to have to treat them if they are Obama/health care reform supporters, was on my radio show Friday night, but didn’t seem to know much about the health care bill he’s criticizing.

    At 1:46 in:

    Cassell: Hospice cuts in 2012…Does the government want people to die slowly?
    Colmes: Do you really think the government wants people dead?
    Cassell: Well I think that they’re cutting all supportive care, like nursing homes, ambulance services…
    Colmes: What to you mean they’re cutting nursing homes?
    Cassell: They’re cutting nursing home reimbursements
    Colmes: Isn’t what they’re cutting under the Medicare plan what was really double dipping; they were getting credits and they were getting to deduct them at the same time.
    Cassell: Well you know, I can’t tell you exactly what the deal is.
    Colmes: If you can’t tell us exactly what the deal is, why are you opposing it and fighting against it?
    Cassell: I’m not the guy who wrote the plan.
    Colmes: But if you don’t know what the deal is why are you speaking out against something you don’t know what the deal is?
    Cassell: What I get online, just like any other American. What I’m supposed to understand about the bill should be available to me.
    Colmes: It is; it’s been online for a long time; it’s also been all over the media…

    In fact, the National Association of Home Care and  Hospice praises much of the bill.

    The health care bill is sweeping legislation in every sense, beginning with a ground-up transformation from an acute care-based, institutionally oriented health system to one that focuses on disease prevention and home and community-based care, the latter primarily through the bill’s inclusion of a program called the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act and significant expansions of Medicaid. As you may already know, the Florida Medicaid program’s annual budget now surpasses the statewide education budget. If (and it’s a BIG if) this CLASS act does what it says it will do, it could provide an opportunity for expansion of home health care services over time as changes are implemented and the cost savings that can be attributed to home health care versus institutional care are realized.

    And while there was opposition to the House version of the bill, the version that was passed, the Senate version, is much more acceptable to the home health care and hospice community.

    The original House legislation would have imposed deeper cuts in projected home health and hospice spending over the next 10 years (approximately $55 billion for home health and $10 billion for hospice). The Senate version which was approved last night is a kinder, gentler version of home health care cuts, taking effect in smaller doses and a later implementation date than the original House bill so that agencies could adapt their operations and care practices to the changes.

    Perhaps Dr. Cassell might want to revisit his opposition after learning more about the bill.

    Post to my social network or blog

    Let's not allow the facts to get in the way of anything.

    Posted via web from Doug's posterous